The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the minutes of phone call in three different services in the United Kingdom over a 7-year period
Overall, Britishers spent more time on calling by phones throughout the period. While local-fixed line was called by for the longest time in all examined years, mobiles were seen with the shortest number of minutes calling
In 1995, people preferred to make phone calls through local-fixed line the most with around 70 billion minutes, this number rose steadily to reach its peak at 90 in 1998. However, during the following 3 years, this figure dropped down to the same it had in the beginning. In contrast, the time called through National and international-fixed line was reported with steady and constant growths throughout the period
Although in 1995 the gap between the minutes counted in the telephone calls with national and international-fixed line and mobiles was significant with almost 35%. In 1995, the usage of mobiles was uncommon when it was seen with no more than 5 billion minutes. However, this figure increased marginally to almost 45 billion in the final year, which was only 15 billion lower than that of national and international-fixed line
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- Task 2 Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Open plan office no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In this technological era personal information is held on computers by many companies and organisations Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92030457824 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.9052241935 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140577964088 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06812195411 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416773079183 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967296828269 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116829256351 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.