the chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar chart illustrates how many minutes of telephone calls were made by three categories in the UK, over a period of 8-year from 1995.
Overall, the number of telephone calls in local remained relatively constant while the rate of those for national and international as well as mobiles witnessed moderate growth. Also, local was the category used in Uk for calling.
In 1995, local fixed line calls were at the highest point, at around 72%. By contrast, the number of mobile calls was at its lowest point, only 3%. Approximately 37% of national and international fixed-line calls were made in the UK.
The rate for local fixed line increased steadily and hit a peak at 90% in 1999 and then dropped to nearly 72% in 2002 which was the same as in 1995. However, national and international fixed line calls as well as mobile calls experienced a constant rise throughout the period and reached the highest point at 61% and 55% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-26 | Ahmad_off | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-26 | Ahmad_off | view | |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rly 72% in 2002 which was the same as in 1995. However, national and internationa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79141104294 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69307684216 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546012269939 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4327820283 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226137476058 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110812410363 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912524481623 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165982924095 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107418507759 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.