The bar chart gives information about how much time the UK residents make a phone call that including local fix line, national and international- fixed line and mobiles in the periods of 7 years from 1995 to 2002.
As can be seen from the chart, both of the national- international and mobiles were upward in the whole period. The type of local line was higher than two others.
In 1995, the minutes of local line was over 70 billions, nearly doubling that of national and international, at over 35 billions minutes while the mobile phones were trust over 3 billions. The local lines have increased slightly until 1999, reaching at peak 90 billions minutes. In contrast, there were witnessed a sharp decrease from 2000 in 85 billions to 2002 in 73 billions.
On the other hand, national and international calls have growth rapidly from over 35 billions in 1995 to 62 billions in 2002.
The figure of mobiles started at only 2 billions and it was slight until 1998 at nearly 10 billions minutes. However, the trends also have growth significantly during the period between 1999 and 2002 at 45 billion minutes.
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo, Japan, listened to music over the previous month. The pie chart shows a record company’s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music.Summarize the information by selecting 79
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 61
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificantly during the period between 1999 and 2002 at 45 billion minutes.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.796875 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6055777427 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9383625252 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168241192253 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751368567306 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528870314116 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106414718264 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492660300619 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.