The chart below shows the value of one country's export in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The first chart reveals the change in the number of one area's export in five different categories during 2015 and 2016. The second table gives information about the rate change in each type of export earning among 2015 and 2016.
Overall, it is evident that the trend in the chart saw a remark decrease both 2 years with all of categories. The table showed the different percentages among 5 types of export, in addition, the percentage of Textiles was the highest point compared with four remain categories.
Looking at the chart, the total number of Petroleum products always was the biggest number, which the data saw steady increase 1 billions, from 2015 to 2016 with 61 billions and 62 billions respectively, the opposite was true for the figure for Gems and Jewellery declined 1 billion. How number of Agricultural products during 2015 and 2016 witnessed the same level, stood at 31 billions.
It can be seen from the table, there was under 1 percent in the percentage change in Agricultural products, while the figure for Textiles reached a peak at 15.24 percent, which had approximately 4 times more than that in Agricultural products of export. Followed the proportion of Textiles, over 8 percent was the percentage of Engineered goods. The rate was 3 percent, which was the figure for Petroleum products has under 5 times compared the proportion of Textiles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both view and give your own opinion 78
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98695652174 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72031147444 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.139583038 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.444444444 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316334191799 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142301224916 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121474148476 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208245650222 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148590881595 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.