The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph and the table illustrates the figure for money of one nation’s exports in five different types from 2015 to 2016 measured in billions of dollars.
In general, it is clear that the majority earnings from petroleum products and engineered goods was highest, while the agricultural products and textiles was change largely. In contrast, the gems and jewellery dropped slightly over the course of one years.
The export earnings of petroleum products increased small around $61 in 2015 to almost $63 in 2016. Furthermore, there was a slight rise around $58 to $61 in the money earnings of engineered goods from 2015 to 2016. That translate to a 3% rise for petroleum products and a more significant increase 8.5% for engineered goods.
Three categories other in group were lower than. In term of agricultural products, the export earnings was almost same from 2015 to 2016, at $31 compared with almost $32, that translate to a 0.81% rise. In addition, the money earnings from textiles was increased significantly at $26 to 31$, around 15.24%. On the contrary, gems and jewellery that only one dropped in various categories at $43 to 41% between 2015 from 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 78
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 67
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 76
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one year', 'a year', or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: one year; a year; years
...ery dropped slightly over the course of one years. The export earnings of petroleum prod...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$31'.
Suggestion: $31
...les was increased significantly at 6 to 31$, around 15.24%. On the contrary, gems a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, well, while, in addition, in contrast, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93846153846 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78636673452 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3553390593 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213212608795 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972327444467 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809172912903 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137986106657 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686643713683 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.