The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The two charts give information about exporting development of one nation in 2015 and 2016. The bar chart compares the value of exportation to 5 categories during the two-period, and the table shows data about the proportion change in each type of export in 2016 compared with 2015.
Overall, it is clear that exporting petroleum products earned the highest in both years 2015 and 2016, while the lowest figure of exports was textiles. We can also see that most kinds of export goods experienced an upward trend in ratio during this period.
In 2016, about 63 billion dollars was received for selling petroleum products overseas, followed by engineer goods, gems, and jewelry (63 billion and 41 billion dollars respectively). By contrast, agricultural products and textiles earned about 31 billion dollars, which was twice lower than petroleum products’ earnings.
Looking at the percentage change in more detail, textiles witnessed a significant rise (15.24%) by 2016. The figure for petroleum products increased around 3%, which was roughly tripled when it comes to that of engineered goods. Conversely, the only decline of 5 categories was gems and jewelry, with an approximately 5.18% decrease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the info about the languages that 13 year old students in one school chose to study Summarize the info by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You can write in 100 130 words 78
- Causes and solutions to global warming 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 78
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 89
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who wants to study in universities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35789473684 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76695979045 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.111111111 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358243896809 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150654262497 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17846204484 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224845003031 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213656645601 0.0819641961636 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.