Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There has been a heated debate about whether zoos should be abolished for treating animals cruelly. While many people approve of this suggestion, I hold a firm belief that zoos are making great contributions to wildlife conservation.
On the one hand, governments should close down zoos for the following reasons. Firstly, animals have rights just as humans do, and being kept in cramped cages is immoral. Animals have evolved from nature and each belongs to undisturbed habitats where they are left alone to live, breed and seek food. In contrast, when living in cages for a long time, they will lose natural instincts such as hunting, mating. Consequently, these animals may die if people release them to wildlife. Secondly, few zoos approach satisfactory standards for animals. They may suffer diseases, maltreatment including lacking in food and care. Thus animals’ physical and mental health are affected considerably, they become distressed and overly aggressive.
On the other hand, zoos in some way contribute advantageously to wildlife protection. They are useful for educational purposes. To be more specific, children are able to observe closely animals from many countries that they may never have a chance to see, as well as learn about the animal kingdom and the relation of them. As a result, zoos raise awareness of wildlife protection and people will have more sympathy for animals. Moreover, endangered species can be protected from potential dangers such as predators, hunters, poachers and extinction. Scientists nowadays are afforded valuable opportunities to study animals in strange environments, and draw conclusions about how we can affect their natural habitats, which therefore create breeding programmes to reduce the risk of extinction.
In conclusion, although zoos may treat animals inhumanely because of poor care and the lack of food, I still believe that they are all playing an important role in education and preservation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | amellia1607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | thuthao2000 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | stewies | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | xuanmailonton | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- The following chart shows the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to Housing preferences of UK people 44
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricans and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many people believe that good planning is a key factor to success in life while others believe that other factors like hard work or luck are important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In the past people liked to store knowledge in books However in the present we prefer to store knowledge on the Internet Do you think it is a positive or a negative trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ent including lacking in food and care. Thus animals’ physical and mental health are...
^^^^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecome distressed and overly aggressive. On the other hand, zoos in some way cont...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88412347619 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650326797386 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9743133631 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2941176471 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254051347826 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804593376426 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542233188807 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154628038672 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478628331392 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.