The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the number of exports in $ billions divided into five categories while the table indicates the proportion change in values of them in the same period.
Overall, there are changes in all surveyed categories that showed a downward and upward trend. Especially, this period witnessed the strongest increase in the values of textiles in the inverse figure to agricultural products.
In the bar chart, petroleum products and engineered goods were in the majority of the value of exports. Both of them underwent slight rises, from just over 60 to nearly 63 and about 58 to 62 billion dollars, respectively. Besides, agriculture and textiles were akin to the two aforementioned categories. Specifically, there were nearly 1 and almost 5 $ billion of increasing values, respectively. Contrary to that trend, the number of gems and jewellery decreased insignificantly from 43 to 41 $ billion.
In the table, the increase in the export value of textiles was estimated to be 15.24%. The figures for engineered goods, agricultural products, and petroleum products were 8.5%, 0.81%, and 3% respectively whilst there was a slight fall in this figure for gems and jewellery with 5.18% of decreasing export
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 74
- The diagram below describes the structure of home smokery and how t work 17
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$5'.
Suggestion: $5
...fically, there were nearly 1 and almost 5 $ billion of increasing values, respectiv...
^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...lly, there were nearly 1 and almost 5 $ billion of increasing values, respectively. Con...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$41'.
Suggestion: $41
...ry decreased insignificantly from 43 to 41 $ billion. In the table, the increase ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...creased insignificantly from 43 to 41 $ billion. In the table, the increase in the e...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33678756477 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06447106754 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7640994156 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138552609198 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551620788268 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633443777274 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100389041273 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578299422579 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.