The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The chart illustrates the values of exported goods of one country in 2015 and 2016. The table compares the percentage changes in values of each type of exports in 2016 to that of 2015.
Overall, export earnings increased in the 2-year period, except for the gems and jewelry earnings. Earning from petroleum products was the highest among those of 5 categories.
Look at the chart first, in 2016, export earning from petroleum products was the highest, which was over $65 billion, came after by that of engineered goods with about $63 billion. Textiles brought the lowest earning among 5 categories, which was only over $35 billion. These number of gems and jewelry and agricultural products were over $50 billion and $40 billion respectively. In 2015, petroleum products and engineered goods still had the highest values of exports with nearly the same amount of $70 billions. gems and jewelry had over $50 billion earning. In the meanwhile, agricultural goods and textiles were two categories bringing the least earnings with the same amount of over $40 billion.
The percentage change in value in 2015 and 2016 had an upward trend in 4 categories. Textiles had the fastest increase, which was 15,24%; came after by engineered goods with 8,5%. petroleum products increased 3% in value. This number of agricultural products was only 0,81%, which was the lowest change among 4 types of goods. In contrast, there was a downward trend in the export value of gems and jewelry, which decrease 5,18% in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Gems
...h nearly the same amount of 0 billions. gems and jewelry had over 0 billion earning....
^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Petroleum
...me after by engineered goods with 8,5%. petroleum products increased 3% in value. This nu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, still, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.964 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62762249952 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.834940739 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7333333333 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262700104277 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119776873762 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157969736566 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229311936881 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.21936020579 0.0819641961636 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.