The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar chart highlights the amount of export income of a nation in five different categories in two years 2015 and 2016 combined with the percentage table of changing in each category.
Overall, what stands out from the chart and table are that there was an upward trend in the earnings of petroleum products, engineered goods, agricultural products and textiles, while the other one had a reverse pattern. Noticeably, the value of exports in petroleum products and engineered goods surpassed the others and was the highest in two years.
Looking at the chart and table in detail, it can be seen that in 2015, petroleum products were recorded as the highest income with roughly 60 billion, followed by engineered goods with over half of 50 billion. However, in the next year, if the value of petroleum products just rose 3%, that of engineered goods went up 8.5%, which almost equal to the former.
On top of that there were noticeable points of the rest of three categories, at the beginning of the period, gems and jewellery’s earnings were the most popular, followed by agricultural products and textiles, respectively. After one year, these figures experienced differences. The income of gems and jewellery went down 5.18% but still outweighed the others. Textiles’ earnings witnessed a remarkble increase with over 15% and became equal to the value of agricultural products although it just grow roughly 1%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, still, well, while, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11965811966 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77680456324 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6093699512 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.111111111 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176427379626 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720184182784 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959232897477 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130699435905 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116521909489 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, still, well, while, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11965811966 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77680456324 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6093699512 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.111111111 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176427379626 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720184182784 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959232897477 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130699435905 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116521909489 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.