The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

The chart gives about how much money earned from exporting in several items in a country in the two years (2015 and 2016) and units are measured in billions of dollars. While the table depicts the percentage change in various categories for export in 2016 compared with 2016.
Overall, it can be manifested that there was an item in 2016 the highest money than that in 2015 except engineered products. And both years textiles was the highest percentage of increased.
First of all, there were about 72 billion dollars were exporting petroleum products in 2016. The figure was higher than in 2015 (61 billion dollars). However, 2016 higher than 2015 engineering good with around 61 billion dollars and 58 billion dollars. In contrast, 2015 higher than the figures for 2016 gems and jewelry (42 billion dollars and 41 billion dollars). And agriculture products are the same for 2015 and 2016 (31 billion dollars) respectively. Around 26 billion dollars and almost 31 billion dollars earned in exporting goods in 2015 and 2016.
Secondly, the highest percentage increase both years for textiles(15.24%). And the very lowest percentage increased in agricultural products(0.81%). 3% and 8.5% increased for petroleum products and engineered goods. Finally, the percentage of Gems and jewelry items decreased by 5.18 percent in 2016 compared to 2015.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 84 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 80 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 73 view
2023-12-09 Tosyne 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... billion dollars respectively. Around 26 billion dollars and almost 31 billion do...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, while, in contrast, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18055555556 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69082660896 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476851851852 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9923458926 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9285714286 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303089730979 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122696956311 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113595268005 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205955354906 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14006805676 0.0819641961636 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.