The graph illustrates the export amounts of one country in several categories during 2015 and 2016. Moreover, the percentage change of exports in each category in 2016 versus 2015 is represented in the table. It can be easily shown that petroleum products and engineered products were the major export categories in this country in those years. Furthermore, except for gems and jewellery, another export amount of other categories increased in 2016.
By looking into details, slightly more than 60 billion dollars of petroleum products were exported in 2015, and it increased by 3% in 2016. Engineered goods were exported with an amount of approximately $56 billion in 2016, and with an increase of 8.5%, it came to more than $60 billion in 2016. Gems and jewellery, of which only one export category decreased in 2016, exported more than $40 billion in 2015 and went down by 5.18%. Nearly $30 billion of agricultural products exported in 2015 and almost remained the same in 2016, with an only 0.81% rise. Although textile is the smallest export category in 2015, roughly $25 billion, it had the highest percentage of increase in 2016, 15.24%.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 67
- An increasing number of people now prefer to go shopping in supermarkets rather than small shops and local markets Is this a positive or negative development 70
- IELTS Writing Task 1 Percentages of Sodium Saturated Fats Sugars in Meals 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2015, and it increased by 3% in 2016. Engineered goods were exported with an a...
^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y one export category decreased in 2016, exported more than 0 billion in 2015 and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, moreover, well, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98947368421 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69679197948 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.9144543344 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448584246266 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242960313713 0.103423049105 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10554332595 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.390394466159 0.15604864568 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629715206226 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.