The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The bar chart compares the export earnings by billion dollars in a country from 2015 to 2016. The table indicates the export growth by percentage of each category over the same period.
Petroleum products appeared to predominate in the value of exports with roughly 70 billion dollars in 2015. Although it continued leading in 2016, its growth only stood at 3 percent. The value of engineered goods was slightly less than that of petroleum products in 2015. Interestingly, the export growth of this category was up to 8.5 percent and 70 billion dollars' worth of engineered goods was exported in the following year. Gems and jewelry exports ranked third out of the categories with over 50 billion dollars in 2015. A striking point is that it was the only category decreasing 8.5 percent in export growth in 2016. The value of agriculture products exports seemed to remain constant with nearly 40 billion dollars and the percentage change in value accounting for 0.81 percent. Textiles exports was valued at roughly 35 billion dollars. However, it grew up to 15.24 percent to reach 40 billion dollars in 2016.
Generally, the figures revealed no change in order of the value of exports in five categories whereas export growth of each category represented differently. Petroleum products accounted for the largest value of exports. Textiles grew fastest over two years.
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'grew the fastest'.
Suggestion: grew the fastest
... the largest value of exports. Textiles grew fastest over two years.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11555555556 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63553681837 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8408047952 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2142857143 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0714285714 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92857142857 5.23603664747 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366739372933 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143567910015 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899405120647 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297119885141 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854734035079 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.