The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart reveals the global income in different kinds of products during 2015 and 2016 while the table demonstrates the changes of those values in one year.
From a general perspective, the amount of money which was earned from petroleum products is the highest while textiles experienced a noticeable rise in their values.
As can be seen from the bar chart, petroleum products constitutes a vast majority of national manufacturing in both years, with over 60 billions for each.The reverse is true for the textile industry with more products were exported to overseas in 2016 than in 2015, accounting for slightly 30 billions for the former and nearly 27 billions for the latter.The number of engineered goods which were supplied to other countries is twice higher than that of agricultural products, with over 60 billions compared to 30 billions of their agicultural industry.Gems and jewellery products in both years share equally balanced proportion of national income with nearly 40 billions for each.
As is illustrated from the table,it is noticeable that the value of textile rose significantly by 15,24%,followed by 8.5 % of engineered goods.Besides,gems and jewellery suffer from a slip of 5.18% while petroleum products experienced a slight rise with 3% higher than the former year.Lastly,there was a minimal rise in argricultural products with only 0.81%.
- the diagram below shows how electricity is generated in hydroelectric power station. 56
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- the tables below 11
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...h years, with over 60 billions for each.The reverse is true for the textile industr...
^^^
Line 9, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...r and nearly 27 billions for the latter.The number of engineered goods which were s...
^^^
Line 9, column 512, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '30 billion'.
Suggestion: 30 billion
...ucts, with over 60 billions compared to 30 billions of their agicultural industry.Gems and jew...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 554, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Gems
... billions of their agicultural industry.Gems and jewellery products in both years sh...
^^^^
Line 13, column 33, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...h. As is illustrated from the table,it is noticeable that the value of textile...
^^^
Line 13, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...%,followed by 8.5 % of engineered goods.Besides,gems and jewellery suffer from a slip o...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , gems
...wed by 8.5 % of engineered goods.Besides,gems and jewellery suffer from a slip of 5.1...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lastly
...ise with 3% higher than the former year.Lastly,there was a minimal rise in argricultur...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...th 3% higher than the former year.Lastly,there was a minimal rise in argricultural pro...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, lastly, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39170506912 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17123465413 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 22.4926829268 240% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 211.718563192 43.030603864 492% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 292.5 112.824112599 259% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.25 22.9334400587 237% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139974653677 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940012677507 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893400324462 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940012677507 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893400324462 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.1 13.2329268293 235% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 16.67 61.2550243902 27% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.4 10.3012195122 237% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.87 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.6 10.9970731707 215% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.