The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of waste was collected by a recycling centre between 2011 and 2015. Units are calculated in tons of waste.
In general, four types of waste have similar trend, they fluctuated wildly during 5 years period. Also, paper was by far the most popular waste which was collected.
In the first year, paper was collected the most with 57 tons of waste. By contrast, the figures for garden were lowest point of exactly 32 tons. Glass and tin were reaching at 48 and 35 tons in turn.
The amount of paper grew considerably to 70 tons in 2015, after standing at lowest tons in 2013 among 4 years, with 40 tons of waste . Meanwhile, the remained types of waste witnessed a wild fluctuation from 2012 to 2015. Glass accounted for 52 tons, tins and garden marked up 39 and 35 tons respectively in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 61
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 72
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 56
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate.Write a report 78
- Smoking can cause serious illnesses and should be made illegal To what extent do you agree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Units are calculated in tons of waste. In general, four types of waste have sim...
^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the lowest'.
Suggestion: were the lowest
...te. By contrast, the figures for garden were lowest point of exactly 32 tons. Glass and tin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...013 among 4 years, with 40 tons of waste . Meanwhile, the remained types of waste ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 692.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58278145695 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41417788235 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3696795582 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.2 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209689695766 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869134160171 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138901034296 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150484117058 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142377713379 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.69 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.