The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The column chart illustrates how much waste was collected by a recycling centre over five consecutive years, starting in 2011.
Overall, while the figure for the paper was consistently the highest from 2011 to 2021, and from 2014 to 2015, the majority of waste in 2013 belonged to glass. In addition, throughout these years, the waste garden was always the least among the four categories.
As can be seen from the column chart, the paper was the most popular waste being collected by the recycling centre in 2015, which accounted for 70 tons. Next came the number of paper in 2011, at 57 tons, which was 17 tons as large as that in 2013, at 40 tons. Also, the figures for the waste paper being collected in 2012 (50 tons) and in 2014 (51 tons) were marginal. Besides, the 2011-2015 period witnessed moderately oscillation of just under 6 tons in the number of waste glass.
Regarding the last two kinds of recyclable waste, the number of collected waste, apart from tins, fluctuated slightly, at 35 tons in 2011, 34 tons in 2013, 33 tons in 2014, and 39 tons in 2015. Consequently, the number of discarded garden reached a peak of just 35 tons in 2015. Likewise, the number of tins hit the lowest point of 27 tons in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 50
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries What are the reasons for this What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, likewise, regarding, so, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58181818182 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44457571231 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7905015332 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32211628555 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136790218668 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107854904125 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221875151665 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738812193653 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.