The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015

The given bar chart represents information about how much water was collected by a recycling centre over the five years, starting in 2011.
Looking at the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the collection of paper waste was maximum in the given four years except 2013 opposite was true for garden waste during the period.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that more than 50 tons of paper were accumulated in the former year. The collection of glass remained constant in the year 2011 and 2013 about 48 tons. Eventually, it struck the highest number. Tins collection was 35 tons in the first year and underwent a more moderate increase in the second year just 41 tons.
Shifting to the remaining data, the collection of tins in the last three years remained almost similar about 34 tons, 39 tons and 39 tons respectively. Less amount of garden waste was collected in the year 2012 only 15 tons and maximum in the year 2015 about 35 tons

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67261904762 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46505480292 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 168.0 22.4926829268 747% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 785.0 112.824112599 696% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 168.0 22.9334400587 733% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 23.0 5.23603664747 439% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161986502009 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161986502009 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11989230217 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673877006823 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 84.6 13.2329268293 639% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -82.12 61.2550243902 -134% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 66.4 10.3012195122 645% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.99 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.88 8.06136585366 185% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 69.2 10.9970731707 629% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.0658536585 497% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.