The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The given chart illustrates the amount of waste that was collected by a recycling centre including four components such as paper, glass, tins and garden from 2011 to 2015.
Overall, it is noticeable that the waste collected by the recycling Centre in all areas increased substantially. Notably, paper waste was most collected among four kinds of waste, while garden waste showed a converse pattern with the lowest number.
In 2011, the number of paper waste collected was recorded at 57 tons of waste, after which saw a considerable decrease to 48 tons of waste in the next two years; however, paper waste collection rebounded to 51 tons in 2014 before reach a peak of 70 tons in the final year. Similarly, glass waste collection began at 48 tons and witnessed a negligible decline (reaching 41 tons) in 2012. The figure then recovered to its initial number in 2013 and fluctuated from 48 to 52 tons from 2013 onward.
The number for tin waste ranged from 27 to 33 tons for the 5-year-period and reached 39 in 2015. Garden waste started a lower period (30 tons), and the figure was roughly halved in 2012, before rebounding to 31 tons in the next year and finishing at 35 tons in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 73
- Some feel that individuals should have the right to strike in all jobs while others feel there are exceptions Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67942583732 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56409335983 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55023923445 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1570344 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336446099869 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166958789259 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107638954531 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241096182877 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112868214268 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.