The chart below shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates how the proportion of people who are participating in the four types of sport in a certain region over 20 years, starting from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, rugby was considered the most favorite sport that had many people took part in the first period while badminton was placed in the last position in 1985. Besides, tennis tended to increase slightly to become the most favorite sport then, whereas rugby decreased significantly. The two remaining other sports remained stable and had no considerable change.
In 1985, the number of people taking part in rugby stood at just under 250 and surpassed the figure for tennis players by around 150. In addition, basketball and badminton have witnessed a low participation rate, with around 80 and 50 respectively.
In the next year, the number of people playing rugby decreased, hitting a low of 50 the same as badminton in the same year. In contrast, the upward trend was tennis with its participation rates increasing to around 225 at the end of the period and becoming the first rank. Finally, the figure for badminton and basketball saw no substantial changes after 20 years, at around 50 and 80 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | wwwdung | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people argue that we should do research into our family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e, with around 80 and 50 respectively. In the next year, the number of people pla...
^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'same' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sames'.
Suggestion: sames
...ugby decreased, hitting a low of 50 the same as badminton in the same year. In contr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the same as badminton in the same year. In contrast, the upward trend was tennis w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, then, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96984924623 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78637665278 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572864321608 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3001732293 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.