The chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years

Essay topics:

The chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.

The pie chart illustrates about the destination of the Anthropology graduates after finishing their undergraduate degree. In addition to it, we also find the table that depicts about the salaries of the Anthropologists after five years of their work.Let us discuss both the diagrams in brief.
Overall, we can observe that most of the Anthropologists work full-time work at 52%. Moreover, 50% of the Anthropologists are paid more than 100,000 dollars.
It is oberserved that there are mainly five ways in which the Antropololgists did the work after they finished their studies.Most of the Antropololgists were employed for the full-time work at 52%, where as the least proportion of Antropololgists we find here is that they work for part time along with their postgraduation study at 5%.Around 8% of Antropololgists did full-time postgraduation study. Although, the same proportion is found for the unkown as well.15% of the Antropololgists do part-time work whereas on the other hand we have 12% of Antropololgist graduates who are unemployed.
In this paragraph, we shall discuss about the table features of the salaries paid to the Antropololgists. Mainly there are three types of employements given in the table along with there are four ranges of the salaries. The government sector pays more than 100,000 dollars to the Antropololgists. The least salary is paid to the freelance consultants and government sector in the range of 25,000 to 49,999 dollars. Around 35% of Antropololgists are paid in the range of 50,000 to 74,999 dollars in private sectors.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-08 nguyendangquang.aspect view
2023-10-05 dhphuc7866 73 view
2023-09-19 steveminh 84 view
2023-07-17 Bùi Xuân Tiến 50 view
2023-06-25 Dipesh1234 73 view
Essays by user Naheer :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Let
...ologists after five years of their work.Let us discuss both the diagrams in brief. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Most
... work after they finished their studies.Most of the Antropololgists were employed fo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...employed for the full-time work at 52%, where as the least proportion of Antropololgists...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ists we find here is that they work for part time along with their postgraduation study a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Around
...g with their postgraduation study at 5%.Around 8% of Antropololgists did full-time pos...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion study. Although, the same proportion is found for the unkown as well.15% of t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, well, whereas, in addition, in brief, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.272 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41619671565 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.2804107043 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219642859014 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845301690031 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091148338992 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149501901165 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120331328478 0.0819641961636 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.