The graph below gives the information about how teenagers(aged14-19) in one state in united states communiated with each other.
The line graph illustrates the means of communication used by the teenagers having the age in the range of 12-19 years from the months November 2006 to Septembre 2009.
Overall, the means of communication often used in one state of USA by teenagers is text messages.The percentage of teenagers using this method of text messaging has increased from 2006 to 2009 by 20%.
Between 2007 to 2009 around 35% of teenagers made use of text messages, calls and talking face to face repectively.In the year 2007,talking face to face was preferred the most.35% of the teenagers at the starting were having a practice of calling,then later it slowly got decreased when text messages came into existence. So,as the technology is imporvising it self,talking physically has decreased at 32% by the end of September 2009.
From the begining onwards, less than 20% are using Email when compared to all other three means of communication.By the end of September 2009, the usage of sending Emails has reduced at 10%.
- The following diagram shows a typical process followed in cheese making 81
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- The bar chart shows the share of poverty of the rural areas in the years 1993 and 2002 The pie chart shows the rural area share and the urban area share of poverty in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make com 86
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 56
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...te of USA by teenagers is text messages.The percentage of teenagers using this meth...
^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ls and talking face to face repectively.In the year 2007,talking face to face was ...
^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , then
...arting were having a practice of calling,then later it slowly got decreased when text...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...en text messages came into existence. So,as the technology is imporvising it self,t...
^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...ce. So,as the technology is imporvising it self,talking physically has decreased at 32%...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , talking
...as the technology is imporvising it self,talking physically has decreased at 32% by the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
... all other three means of communication.By the end of September 2009, the usage of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99878661204 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3853785542 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.0 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934043390671 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521505161317 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449322194126 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641576322097 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418350279338 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.