The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduates degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the paths in which Anthropology students followed after their university graduation. Over half of them secured a full-time job, and this figure was significantly higher than the second most popular choice, part-time work, which took up a share of 15%. The other 33% comprised unemployed graduates, full-time postgrad students, students doing part-time work while furthering their studies, and others with an unknown situation.
The table compares the salaries of Anthropology graduates five years after leaving school. The figures for freelance consultants and people working in government sectors were quite similar, with a small difference in the highest tier of salaries, as 50% of the latter received more than $100,000, compared to 40% of the former. Regarding employees of private companies, while the minority of them (10%) received the smallest figures of $25,000-49,999, the proportions of other levels of salaries were at a relatively same level.
Overall, most of the graduates from Anthropology had full-time work. Moreover, their salaries after half a decade of work varied between $25,000 to over $100,000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...duates five years after leaving school. The figures for freelance consultants and p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56896551724 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87818593687 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8825498255 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187275594348 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106214219961 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973200545499 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135479740631 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401262849751 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.