the chart below sows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
The provided chart compares amount of money spent on consumer goods between four countries, namely Germany, Italy, France and Britain.
According to the bar chart, first of all, it could be seen that Britain was the biggest consumer of the goods which were personal stereos, Tennis rackets, perfumes, CDs, toys and photographic film. Also, it should be noted that it has spent more money on photographic film than other.
It will be exceedingly hard to discriminate country which was smaller consumer. But people of Germany has spent less money on toys while others, both spent equal on it. Personal stereos had more fans on Italy but Germany and France have a less in respect to Italy and same share in its market.
It is immediately apparent from the diagram that Tennis racket and perfumes had experienced similar pattern. Together, the two would have France as their minor consumer and Italy as their major consumer. On the other hand, people of France were buying more CDs after Britain and Germany spent less among other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | shayma | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 67 | view |
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 3
- Should university give financial support to sports and social activities or to the classes and library? 60
- Prevention is better than cure."Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment tospending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood. The idea that women aresolely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that theyare also responsible for bringing the children up 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02873563218 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37386934098 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1792659696 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196040326892 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807075093945 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107034853612 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148214680281 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126659773986 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.