The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares three different types of junk food, namely hamburgers, pizza and fried chicken in term of the number of times per year that Mauritian teenagers ate over a period of 30 years.
In each of these years, the teenagers in Mauritius ate more hamburgers and fried chicken than pizza. It is also noticeable that pizza was the lowest in all kinds of fast food that was brought by teenagers from 1985 to 2015.
In the first year, the consumption of fried chicken stood at around 5 times per year, which was the lowest of three types of junk food. By contrast, the figure of pizza was the highest in 1985, which was exactly 60 times per year. Hamburgers consumption was 10 times per year in the same year.
From 1985 to 2015, the number of times eaten per year in hamburgers witnessed a dramatic growth from 10 times per year to 70 times per year, which was the highest the consumption of fast food in 2015. Similarly, the figure for fried chicken went up gradually during this period, which was the lower than hamburgers, at almost 65 times per year in 2015. In comparison, there was a fall sharply to 10 times in the number of times that teenagers brought pizza after 30 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | Anh15799 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eenagers brought pizza after 30 years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52995391705 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32219658883 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437788018433 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4377658976 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144034952975 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799318109913 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606101131607 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112507139218 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567981818551 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.