The chart illustrates how often did the Americans eat-out in the fast food restaurants through the period of 10 starting from 2003.
Overall, in spite of changing violently, the amounts of people who ate junk food once a week and once or twice a month was outnumbered compared with others. By contrast, the percentages of Americans eating fast food in the restaurants everyday was obviously low.
Looking at the detail, the amounts of people who enjoyed consuming junk food once a week in USA was noticeably high in the year 2003 with more than 30%, however, the percentages of people who ate that kind of food once or twice a month was also not less considerable with exactly 30%. In the next 3 years, there was a marginal rise in the proportions of fast food once a week consumers from about 30% to around 33%.On the other hand, this amount of once or twice a month consumers fail slightly to 25%. In the last 4 years of this period, the percentages of American who ate junk food in the restaurants one time a week drop in-considerably to under 30% and the amounts of people eating that kind of food once or twice a month grew noticeably to nearly 35%.
More specifically, Americans who ate fast food everyday was just accounted under 5% in 2003 and in the same year, people who never consumed junk food accounted exactly 5%. In the year of 2013, both of these amounts decreased marginally to approximate 4% respectively. However, although there was a insignificant increase in the amounts of people who had the habit of eating fast food a few times a year from around 13% to 15%, the proportions of ones eating that food several times a week went down to just above 15% in 2013 after the increase of 20% in 2006.
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 73
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 66
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 73
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ans eating fast food in the restaurants everyday was obviously low. Looking at the de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
... consumers from about 30% to around 33%.On the other hand, this amount of once or ...
^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ecifically, Americans who ate fast food everyday was just accounted under 5% in 2003 and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...spectively. However, although there was a insignificant increase in the amounts o...
^
Line 7, column 447, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...m around 13% to 15%, the proportions of ones eating that food several times a week w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, kind of, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58252427184 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.644319915 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446601941748 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7939105981 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.333333333 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3333333333 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266037691271 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133867966367 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613714202943 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193718189428 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376596994391 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.