The tables below illustrate the money earned by selling coffee and bananas of Fairtrade branch in five countries of Europe. Those information was surveyed in 1999 and 2004.
Overall, although the gains of bananas sales in Denmark and Sweden seen a noticeable drop, in almost mentioned countries, sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas shew the positive trend obviously after the period of 5 years starting from 1999.
Looking at the details, the increase in profit earned of coffee trading in Switzerland was very noteworthy (rose from 3 millions of euros to 6 millions of euros). The second and third most considerable numbers of Fairtrade company were the gains of UK and Denmark on selling coffee, which reached 1.5 and 1.8 millions euros respectively in 1999. However, after 5 year, those profits in UK were nearly twenty times more than it used to while in Denmark the sales of this product have just grown slightly to 2 millions of euros.
The bananas trade in Switzerland, in comparison , were much more flourishing than coffee selling. It gained 15 millions of euros in 1999 and then nearly tripled to 47 millions in 2004. Furthermore, the bananas sales in Belgium and the UK were also remarkable, which increased form 0.6 millions euros to 4 millions and 1 millions euros to 5.5 millions respectively (through the surveyed period). By contrast, the money earned from bananas in Denmark and Sweden of Fairtrade label was falling marginally from 1999 to 2004 (decreased 0.1 millions and 0.8 millions euros respectively).
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However, these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business. Why do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more pe 67
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 66
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 73
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live a new country To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'Those informations'?
Suggestion: This information; Those informations
...ade branch in five countries of Europe. Those information was surveyed in 1999 and 2004. Overa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...itzerland was very noteworthy rose from 3 millions of euros to 6 millions of euros. The secon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...worthy rose from 3 millions of euros to 6 millions of euros. The second and third most consid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...his product have just grown slightly to 2 millions of euros. The bananas trade in Switzerl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...anas trade in Switzerland, in comparison , were much more flourishing than coffee ...
^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...urishing than coffee selling. It gained 15 millions of euros in 1999 and then nearly tripled t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10317460317 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80363953318 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519841269841 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6839841865 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18907242829 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963719910867 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683687445528 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157092095107 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911148019179 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.