The chart below illustrates how often Americans ate fast food in a period of decade, from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, it is clear that most of the Americans ate fast food moderately, while there was no significant change in the number of people who ate every day or never had fast food.
By 2003, almost 30 percent of Americans ate junk foods, before it increased to 33% in 2006 and after that experienced a sharp decline to over a quarter. In contrast, the number of Americans who ate once or twice a month declined from a third in 2003 to 25 percent in 2006 before it increased again by 8 percent after a 7-year period.
On the other hand, the frequency of eating in fast food restaurants for several times a week rose from over 15 percent to one in fifth by 2006 and dropped back to the same amount in 2013. Likewise, the Americans who ate a few times a year became more from 12 percent in 2003 to 15 percent in 2006 and remained same in 2013.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The graph below shows the difference in wheat exports over three different areas. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 33
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK (expresses in percentage terms).Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- People often find it difficult to adapt to new situations in their lives Why do you think this is What measures can you suggest to make it easier 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, third, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29608938547 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37030883455 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530726256983 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.5616117438 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275802825554 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156802879431 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102945631071 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200818884643 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102381748243 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.