The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

The given chart illustrates how often the USA people ate junk food in hotels from 2003 to 2013

Overall, people like to eat food Once a week or Once or twice a month as compare to eating every day or several times a week or never

In 2003, people who frequently went to restaurants Once a week or Once or twice a month both are nearer to 30% when it comes to 2006 and 2013 there is a difference in these rates. Humans who are eating Once a month in the year 2006 is nearer to 32% and this rate is less when it comes to people who are eating food Once or twice a month which is exactly equal to 25% but in 2013 people who eat Once or twice a month are more as compared to people who eat Once a week and their rates are nearer to 32% and just below 30% simultaneously. people who visit restaurants daily and never went to a restaurant are so less in the given years and rate never crossed 5%.

Additionally, people who went to restaurants several times a week in all the 3 years are almost above 15% and 2006 has the highest rate which is equal to 20% when it comes to people who visit restaurants very rarely in a year are exactly 15% in the years 2006 and 2013 and this rate is a little bit less in the year 2003 which is nearer to 13%

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood Once a week or Once or twice a month as compare to eating every day or severa...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ery day or several times a week or never In 2003, people who frequently went to r...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... who eat Once or twice a month are more as compared to people who eat Once a week ...
^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
... 32% and just below 30% simultaneously. people who visit restaurants daily and never w...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... years 2006 and 2013 and this rate is a little bit less in the year 2003 which is nearer t...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.02016129032 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15788353911 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.370967741935 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 62.0 22.4926829268 276% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.036874506 43.030603864 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 249.25 112.824112599 221% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 62.0 22.9334400587 270% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224926698071 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151252746582 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913628039175 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185566539512 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141113427 0.0819641961636 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.5 13.2329268293 215% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.39 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.3012195122 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 6.92 11.4140731707 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 11.4329268293 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.8 10.9970731707 244% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 11.0658536585 262% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.