The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landline phones per 100 people in selected countries.

Essay topics:

The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landline phones per 100 people in selected countries.

The bar chart gives information about the number of mobile and landline phones used per 100 persons in some Nations. Some countries are Canada, US, Germany, Denmark, UK, Sweden, Italy.

Overall, In Canada Mobile users are very less on compared to rest of the nations. Italy has the highest number of wired phone users among the all. In general, cell phone usage is more in all nations. At least, one-third of people carries any mode of phones.

Firstly, In mobile phones, Italy has the highest number of users around 90% and then followed on by Sweden and UK has a total figures of 88% and 86%.In the Canada, little more than one-third and in the US less than one half prefers cellular connection. Also, Denmark and Germany has figures approximately three fourth of total users.

Lastly, The other mode, landlines has the significant users in Denmark stands at 84% and the least users in the Italy which is less than one half. Other countries, The US and the Sweden have equal users of 68 per hundred people's. 60 people's out of 100 prefers landlines in the Canada and the Germany.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-15 Sandhu param 61 view
2019-11-04 sou@M 56 view
2019-08-09 ravitejacts 78 view
2019-04-30 mohsenmortazavi 11 view
2019-04-26 vinusharma27 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...d UK has a total figures of 88% and 86%.In the Canada, little more than one-third ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, so, then, third, at least, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28239073763 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5141259664 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8181818182 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250148654228 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100839138782 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108868920426 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159573013656 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871492951677 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.