The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
The bar chart illustrates the number of per hundred users of mobile and landline phones in diverse countries such as: Canada, US, Germany, Denmark, UK, Sweden, Italy.
Overall, It can be seen that, the usage of mobile phone in Italy is approximately double as compare to landline phones. However, mobile phone used very less in Canada rather than other nations.
After minute concentration on this bar chart, it is quite evident that those masses who live in Canada they use almost 40 and 60, mobile and landline phones out of per hundred respectively. While, in the case of US, these figures are slightly more . Moreover, the number of Italian landline phone users is least, but, the user of mobile phone is maximum in Italy which are account for 50 and 90 number of people, out of 100 sequencely.
Probing Further, in comparison to mobile phone users, landline users are higher with the difference of 10 number of phones /100 people in Germany. Furthermore, the usage of mobile and landline phone in Sweden and Denmark is same at 88 phones from per 100 homosapiens. Althogh, out of one hundred individuals only 80 number of masses have mobiles in Denmark.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e of US, these figures are slightly more . Moreover, the number of Italian landlin...
^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Moreover, the number of Italian landline phone users is least, but, the user of m...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ber of masses have mobiles in Denmark.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89898989899 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54344836146 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60101010101 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0952353017 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429508965345 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181879811844 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100438935996 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273385375987 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797466547248 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.