The chart shows the number of students in a UK university who completed (on time or late), failed to write, and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010.
The bar chart compares the figures for undergraduates of a UK university who finished their dissertations in terms of whether they completed it on time, failed, or needed to revise it within the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that the university experienced a significant higher number of on-time-finished projects as well as a sharp decrease in the failure rate in each of the years.
In 1990, a total of 150 students finished their projects on time, and this figure kept on increasing over time to precisely 300 in 2010. Nonetheless, there was a similar upward trend in the late-finished dissertations as the number rose gradually from about 20 in 1990 to almost 50.
On the other hand, the failure rate registered a steady drop throughout the years from nearly 50 in 1990 to around 10. Finally, the number of the revised dissertations fluctuated with a moderate increase and a slight decline of, respectively, about 20 and 10.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | isuckatthiswritting | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Thang Tran | 87 | view |
- The chart shows the number of students in a UK university who completed on time or late failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990 2000 2010 90
- The graphs below shows the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 who participated in organized cultural activiies and sports in 2003 in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The graphs below shows the percentage of boys and girls aged 5-14 who participated in organized cultural activiies and sports in 2003 in Australia. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, nonetheless, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98136645963 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12235227905 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9940471128 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335245522442 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146075952499 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107130797694 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188093396039 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11539916083 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.