The chart shows the number of students in a UK university who completed (on time or late), failed to write, and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010.

Essay topics:

The chart shows the number of students in a UK university who completed (on time or late), failed to write, and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010.

The provided chart illustrates the status of students' essay in a UK tertiary school in three periods 1990, 2000 and 2010.

Overall, students who handed in and rewrote their dissertation on time have observed a significant increase while the opposite was true for those that failed to complete. It is also of note that the completion rate has always been outstrip the failed rate, with the tremendous number of students submitted before the deadline.

As c be seen from the chart, in 1990, there is 150 postgraduate had finished their projects, which rose up to more than 200 people prior to being doubled in the next 20 years. On the contrary, the number of students unsuccessfully passed the writing has witnessed a decline. To be in details, the highest number was around 50 in 1990 and when it comes to 21st century, that figure had drop considerably to approximately 10 people.

By comparison, the ratio of undergraduate that completed after deadline was about 20, 30, 50 respectively in the three given timescales. With regard to the rewritten figure, the lowest rate of student imposed in the first year examined with just under 10 students, followed by an upward trend in 2000 by 40 before going down by around 7 people in the last surveyed year.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-27 huy232 78 view
2019-08-24 hoang ngoc my 89 view
2019-07-22 isuckatthiswritting 78 view
Essays by user hoang ngoc my :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outstripped', 'outstript'.
Suggestion: outstripped; outstript
...hat the completion rate has always been outstrip the failed rate, with the tremendous nu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'dropped'.
Suggestion: dropped
... comes to 21st century, that figure had drop considerably to approximately 10 people...
^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'dropped'.
Suggestion: dropped
... comes to 21st century, that figure had drop considerably to approximately 10 people...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, on the contrary, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87441860465 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75337051916 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8712869467 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311523926702 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118092709929 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753953589001 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171342308822 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811325811262 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.