The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016
The bar chart compares how three types of groups in Australia which used social media for business reasons changed from 2012 to 2016.
Overall, it is clear that the large group was the most use in social media, although the figure for using the Internet of three groups in 2015 was low.
Between 2012 and 2014. The average percentage of a large group using social media for business purposes was highest, accounting for around 75%; compared with about 40% for the average of a medium group and approximately 30% for small group. Furthermore, the proportion of the medium group in 2012 was nearly the same as the small one in 2012 and 2013, occupying around 30% each.
Over the next two years, using social media of three groups was the most popular in 2016, with just under 50%, around 55% and 80% for small, medium and large groups respectively; after the year 2015 with a lower figure. Large group, additionally, still higher than the remaining groups in this year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-10 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-07 | cheeandy | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-29 | Mr. Triều | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | KayVu | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Ester Nguyễn | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than the remaining groups in this year.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7573964497 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27514600534 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3833280878 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44599709618 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22128491559 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124511403127 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29959609534 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111732099565 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.