The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016.
The given bar chart describes the proportion of small, medium, and large businesses in Australia that used social media for business reasons over the course of 5 years, starting from 2012.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that more and more companies in all groups had social media presence throughout the survey period, except for the dramatic decrease in 2015. It is also apparent that the demand for using social media in large businesses was by far the highest compared 2 remaining groups.
In 2012, there was almost 30% of small companies used social media for working reasons. This figure fluctuated slightly between its original number and approximate 35% in the first 4 years before reaching the peak of half in 2016. A roughly similar trend was seen in the number for medium businesses where it grew by 20% from more than 30% over the period.
Nearly 80% of companies in the large group had social media presence at the beginning of the surveyed period. This number was almost unchanged during 5 years, except for the year 2015, when it hit the bottom of just over 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-10 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-07 | cheeandy | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-29 | Mr. Triều | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | KayVu | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Ester Nguyễn | view |
- The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 84
- The graphs give information about average house prices in England and other parts of the world 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 85
- The diagrams below show the floor plans for a trade conference in 2009 and for the same trade conference in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the types of media used from 1990 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80952380952 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3487773096 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8563140345 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350896182172 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156281249153 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094383411932 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220747053904 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618856600501 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80952380952 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3487773096 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8563140345 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350896182172 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156281249153 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094383411932 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220747053904 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618856600501 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.