The bar chart shows the percentage of small, medium, large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016
The bar chart given illustrates the proportion of social network usage for business intention by firms differed in size.
Overall, large firms occupied the most presence on the social network, whereas it was the least favorite to small firms. Over 5 years, small and medium companies were the ones to have changed the most with almost doubling at the end of the period.
In the first 3 years, all businesses got an increase in their social network usage. Small firms got steady growth, starting at over a quarter and reaching nearly 35 percent, while Medium companies accelerate by 20 percent. On the contrary, the large businesses experienced a slight dip after 3 years.
In the remaining years, all businesses, except for the small one, reported a drastic fall at first in 2015, except for the small one. Following this, interestingly, small, medium, and large companies all got recovered and skyrocketed in 2016, reaching their peak at approximately a half, over a half, and roughly 80 percent respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-10 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-07 | cheeandy | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-29 | Mr. Triều | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | KayVu | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Ester Nguyễn | view |
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- The two maps below show the road access to the hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 73
- The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, while, except for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11976047904 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74438395641 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1178626167 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25377923264 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110579366197 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334494803905 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158764470934 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197792972474 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.