The chart shows percentage of male and female academic staff members in all faculties of a major university in 2012
The bar graph shows the proportion of men and women who worked as faculty members in seven different departments of a leading university in 2012.
There was a huge gender disparity between faculties of different departments. Disciplines like engineering, business and science were male dominated. Whereas, courses like education and arts are more number of female members in. Remarkably, 82% of engineering teachers were men while only 17% of engineering teachers were women.
It is fascinating that the ratio of male-female in business and science is almost the same with 65% male and 35% female educator. After education and arts, law has a slightly higher percentage of female members with 40%. In medicine, the gap between the teachers of both genders was the least.
Even though, departments like engineering, business, science and law were led by men, departments like arts and education had more number of women members in 2012.
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal of money more than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified, while others think it is unfair 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of wether the course 61
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories, from 1995-2004. 56
- Government should spend more money on railways than roads.To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87255983402 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5064096244 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213481733467 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860418831528 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684337138052 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134411613084 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629236702161 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.