It is widely assumed that there is a strong tendency of the young generation to completely fulfill their materialistic values like wealth, a healthy lifestyle and a long lifespan. Having said that, they are hardly unable to experience happiness in their entire lives. I personally believe that technology and pursuance of career are the roots of this problematic issue. This essay will first give plausible explanations, and then inform some optimal solutions to solve this obstacle.
There is no room for doubt that the advancement of technological devices and pursuing one’s career probably detach young people from happiness. Firstly, due to the fact that technology provides youngsters a wide range of applications to secure their entertainment purposes, resulting in being stuck in a rut with mundane a lifestyle. On top of that, getting high exposure to working greatly distances people from society. It is because the young generation is passionately obsessed to be a high achiever who works diligently to support their relatives and themselves. For instance, by totally being engrossed in job security, they simply forget about other simple developments of their inner emotions.
There are, however, many ways to greatly improve this trendy situation. First of all, the instant intervention of family would be such a great help to develop emotional values in a person. Many people commonly argue that happiness is originated from family, thus, being supported by family members have always been a therapeutic medication to cultivate happiness. Moreover, doing charity is hugely advisable to search for one’s joy. For example, the recent report from Stanford University has revealed that voluntary work brings people a sense of purpose in their lives, and therefore, provokes sentimental values like happiness.
In conclusion, despite having a strong sense of achievement like being physically and mentally healthier or more wealthy, the youth seems to lack of sentimental values such as happiness due to the rapid development of technology as well as being caught up in a rat race. There are, however, some available suggestions to improve this problem.
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summerise the information by selecting the main features and make comparations where relevant 84
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students wanting to study overseas chose a university from 1998 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 89
- The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and plans also give a description of proposed changes Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 79
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...okes sentimental values like happiness. In conclusion, despite having a strong s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44082840237 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91450153139 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5082777544 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9375 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153240040618 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482581641935 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302818242698 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965549979689 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186844897938 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.