The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates the rate at which airline passengers of Wright Brothers Airways filled the seats in three different years( 2005, 2010 and 2015). The figures are given as percentages.

Overall, it is clear that the premium economy class was the most preferred, followed by the economy and first class in the three years. Airline commuters least preferred the business class in 2010 and 2015.

In 2005, 85% of the passengers occupied the premium economy, however, this figure increased by one in ten to 95% in 2010 and 2015 respectively. Similarly, equal proportions of people filled up the economy and first class in the first two years at 80% each. What is more, while economy class increased by 10% passengers, first class went up by a mere 5% in the final year.

Interestingly, a reverse trend can be noticed in the business class amongst the four categories. A dramatic drop was noticed in the number of seats being filled from 2005 to 2010. Exactly 90% of its seats were filled in 2005, after which it fell by more than a third to 65% five years later. Following this, there was an increase of 10 percentage points to 75% at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 4.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o years at 80% each. What is more, while economy class increased by 10% passenger...
^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich it fell by more than a third to 65% five years later. Following this, there ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, third, while, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70243902439 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53656660406 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0887199871 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6363636364 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147954048884 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584859731803 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571036570793 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985242765674 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485113049714 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.