The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A pie chart illustrates the analysis result of the main motive why adolescent use the phone during the period from 2016 to 2019 in an African country
As shown in the chart, the usage of social media oftens took more than half of the figure. Followed by email adopted 1/4 of the data. While digital camera and phone come last
Although the overall trend of social media usage had increased over the year between 2016 to 2017, there had been a slight drop by 2%. During a span of three years, the number had risen by 6%. Come in second place was email, even though, statics had gradually decreased over the years, dropped at 24% in 2017 then 20% in 2018 and 19% in 2019
Regarding digital cameras, the number remained the same throughout the period from 2016 to 2017. However, there had been a slight growth in 2018 and 2019 at 18% and 20%. The overall analysis for phone calls fluctuated but on the momentum of plunging. In 2019, the data had reduced by half compared to 10% in 2016. Whilst the status of social networks and emails were increasing. Contrary, digital camera and phone calls were declining
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | pttd.duong@gmail.com | view | |
| 2023-04-21 | pttd.duong@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | Md Mazedul Islam | 73 | view |
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 78
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59798994975 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16814226652 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 76.5368538679 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148428440548 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521864842298 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624247441628 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108828313524 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954277189902 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.