The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
The given diagrams compare the key motivations of the adolescents for using phones in a selected Asian country in a 3-year period starting from 2016 to 2019.
Overall, the use of social networks occupied a vast majority, whereas the data of phone calls were the lowest number. In addition to that, the tendency of using phones shared the same picture in 4 examined years.
In detail, as for 2016, the principal reason for teenagers to use the mobile devices was for social media, which took up sharply a half of all reported purposes and doubled the second highest figure of emailing. The figure witnessed an inconsequential decline of 2 percent in the following year, reaching its bottom of the period of 48 percent. Besides, other reason for using phones, which are digital camera and phone calls, remained roughly the same in 2016 and 2017, with a mere marginal decrease of phone calls.
Concerning the percentage of 2018, the usage of phones for social networks increased by 3 percent and that of photography went up by 3 percent, while the proportion of emailing went down by 4 percent. This was followed by another decrease in 2019, reaching its lowest point of 19 percent. In the final examined period of 2018 to 2019, the purpose of contact experienced a dwindle of 6 percent, becoming the sole figure with one-digit number.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Phạm Gia Bảo | view | |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | drikbest | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 73
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...019, the purpose of contact experienced a dwindle of 6 percent, becoming the sole figure ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, so, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85964912281 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60201226674 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0143004269 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.111111111 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227743987321 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927333770768 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661210659578 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143303131385 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566197097422 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.