The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014.
The change in the purchase of five various jams in millions of units from 2009 to 2014 is displayed in the line graph.
Overall, the most favorite variant of jam was made from strawberry. Additionally, the whole figures experienced an upward trend, except in the sales of plum variety.
Initially, strawberry jam was the most popular product among the other variants, sold at slightly over 3 million units, while plum and raspberry one shared a similar number in approximately 2. 5 million units. However, the remaining two figures were less well-known by buyers, with below 2 million units.
Eventually, the strawberry variant increased to more than twofold, being the maximum data recorded, followed by the raspberry one doubling to almost 6 million units. When it comes to grape and cherry product, the purchase of the former inclined to account for 5 million units, while that of the latter grew moderately to be a half of the highest sold product. This contrasts to those increasing, that of plum shrank considerably, no selling observed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The proportion of adult who owned digital devices in the USA from 2004 to 2015 63
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 92
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district 78
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12209302326 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77502259552 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662790697674 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7932692078 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120070120394 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542101537851 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895932420513 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107060766645 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111902779577 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.