Information technology is changing many aspect of our lives and now dominates our home, leisure and work activities.
To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages?
The presence of social media on the Internet is very useful for use in everyday life by the community since the existence of information technology. Although this might be acceptable, this gives more opportunities for education sector, surpassing any demerits.
It is true that the domination of information technology can lead people to use appropriate ways including using social media to connect with their relatives as well as for update their daily lives. While it is seems reasonable, the technology can provide them to become addictive habits. This is not always negative issue as they can use it for work such as meeting in a distance, so that will be easier for them to report any insight. For example, when people are on a business trip out of their town, they can directly call the boss to inform any situation with video Zoom while they work in different areas, and they might use Instagram to update situations with their families.
Another positive impact from the advance of technology is those more obtain opportunities to purchase their daily needs in Internet-based, so it can shorten the time in shopping. Whereas that might be acceptable, the habit of shopping in online stores tends to lead them to waste their money easily. However, information technology can improve the education sector for students to find any kind of resource relating to their study as well as for finishing the task. According to data, almost all students in Indonesia feel satisfied and more efficient when looking for journal materials and books on the Internet to support the learning, and those often purchase books for study from Shoppee as an online shop.
In conclusion, more people are more likely to use information technology since it is really beneficial for their daily lives. Furthermore, the field of education has also been greatly helped by technological developments. Meanwhile, it is still a slightly negative impact.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, really, so, still, well, whereas, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10094637224 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80595778274 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526813880126 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0801413026 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104221380649 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449837529442 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374324726553 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726315646052 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304176770948 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.