Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Visiting extreme places is increasingly popular among tourists because of the advantage, avoiding several health issues. However, the drawback is able to destruct nature there.
Positively, the immense impact of the remote place visits for people are a panacea for health problems. The reason is that the body is forced to activate acclimatization to cope with the harsh climate as well as gaining vitamins to contribute to particular organ systems, strengthening their immune system. For example, outdoor enthusiasts going to the Sahara desert experience a high intensity of sunlight, responding the body to acclimate automatically with this severe condition to synthesize vitamin D from the light of sun. As a result, the respiratory and cardiovascular system are strengthened, being perfect for those suffering from pneumonia and hearth valve disease, respectively.
Nevertheless, this kind of tourism has a detrimental effect on the natural environment. This is because, the waste of visitors can harm wildlife animals, risking the endangered species, and the rate of such those creatures decreases considerably. For instance, international tourists taking an excursion in the Arctic had polluted this special habitat due to the plastic exposure, and polar bears consumed those accidentally. Consequently, this man-made disaster caused a decrease in the population of these endemic species accounted for 30% from 2010 to 2020, then their proportion are predicted to shrink considerably, endangering them being in the edge of extinction.
In conclusion, although extreme tourism have the advantage to improve visitors’ health, the disadvantage of these is to destroy the wildlife environment. Therefore, if tourists remain struggling to explore difficult condition areas, they shall not throw the rubbish there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Ahmad Rifki Hardiansyah | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | Ahmad Rifki Hardiansyah | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | ieltsstudent | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-14 | Faryal Gula | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | bangtaenie_77 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart compares the recycling rates of four different kinds of waste material in a city from 1992 to 2002 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 78
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 84
- Some people think that government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children Do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76579925651 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18062274141 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665427509294 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7755107419 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185118275816 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592913025046 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610471645958 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104016182187 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030449974491 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76579925651 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18062274141 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665427509294 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7755107419 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185118275816 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592913025046 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610471645958 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104016182187 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030449974491 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.