The chart shows the sports played in Australia in 2003.All figures in percentage.
The given bar graph illustrates the information about the 9 categories of sports activities which played by the Australian boys and girls during the year 2003. The data was calibrated in percentum which is clearly and coherently representation.
Overall, it is evident that, the most favourable game in the boys was football whereas, the girls most interested in netball.
It can be seen that,13% boys had go for swimming and 22% girls in Australia. Moreover, 5% girls were played football which is very less as compared to the boys. But, girls were leads in netball game with 23% than boys. After that, girls interested very less in tennis(7%), basketball(7%), and martial arts(3%).
In addition to this, men played tennis basketball and Martial arts was 8%, 8% and 10%, respectively. Moving further, the girls were participated athletics upto 5% while, boys had only 4%. Probing ahead, only 2% girls were like to play cricket whereas,boys were playing cricket much then girls, that was 10%. Noticeably that, only 13% girls were interesting in other activities while, boys had 20%.
- the chart shows the sports played in Australia in 2003.All figures in percentage. 11
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness or decreasing. What do you think are the causes of the problems and what measures take to solve. 73
- Some people think that children should learn paint or draw at school and other believe it just a waste of time discuss both view and give ur opinion. 56
- Nowadays technology is increasing being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening 62
- Technical advancement have decreased the writing and mathematical skills of the students nowdays.Should the use of calculator and computer be limited or not? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...ll. It can be seen that,13% boys had go for swimming and 22% girls in Australia...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...ll. It can be seen that,13% boys had go for swimming and 22% girls in Australia...
^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...were played football which is very less as compared to the boys. But, girls were l...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...very less in tennis7%, basketball7%, and martial arts3%. In addition to this, ...
^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...layed tennis basketball and Martial arts was 8%, 8% and 10%, respectively. Moving...
^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing further, the girls were participated athletics upto 5% while, boys had only 4...
^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , boys
... girls were like to play cricket whereas,boys were playing cricket much then girls, ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s were like to play cricket whereas,boys were playing cricket much then girls, th...
^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: BE_INTEREST_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'interested'?
Suggestion: interested
...%. Noticeably that, only 13% girls were interesting in other activities while, boys had 20%...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13559322034 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76089157044 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7377839566 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6363636364 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0820074513715 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339545912284 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436971089261 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519750908064 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389944265826 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.