The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012

The given line graph depicts the unemployment rates for rural and urban areas in the year 2012. The given data is divided on a quarterly basis.

Overall it can be seen that unempoyment rate for the rural areas had been decreasing, whereas it was increasing for the urban areas. But by the end of the year the unemployment percentage is still greater for rural area than that of urban area.

Firstly, for the rural areas it can been seen that unemployment rate had been decreasing for the first half of the year, and reached its minimum of around 4.5 percent. For other half of the year the unemployment percentage increased a bit and then pleaeaued.

Seconly, for the urban areas the unemployment increased till the first half of the year. Then for the next quarter it decreased and reached its minimum of 2 percent. But after that it gradually increased and almost surpassed the unployment percentage of the rural area.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (4 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n data is divided on a quarterly basis. Overall it can be seen that unempoyment ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...ea. Firstly, for the rural areas it can been seen that unemployment rate had been de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t surpassed the unployment percentage of the rural area.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, still, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8125 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62794477682 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1332103886 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5555555556 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131123224876 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747947200082 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725911738815 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104191130721 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387317628096 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.