The chart shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and October 2010

Essay topics:

The chart shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia {Darwin (1), Sydney (2), Melbourne (3). Brisbane (4), Perth (5) and Canberra (6)} in October 2009 and October 2010

The bar chart illustrates the water levels in reservoirs of different cities in Australia in the October of 2009 and 2010. Overall, except for the dip of Darwin and the stability of Brisbane in water storage levels, other cities saw an upward pattern, with Canberra displaying the most significant growth.

The reservoirs in Darwin experienced a decline in water level, from over 40% to less than 30%, making this city have the lowest water storage capacity. Brisbane, however, had water level remained unchanged throughout the period.

Following the same trend with most of the cities, the water level stored in Sydney’s reservoirs rose slightly from about 75% to just over 80%. Melbourne, which initially witnessed the lowest water storage, surpassed that of Darwin by an increase of more than 10%. Likewise, there was a considerable upturn of above 20% in water storage levels of Perth and Canberra. At the end of the period, Canberra became the city having the highest water storage level in Australia.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-14 Manideep Macherla 73 view
2023-09-29 asemaneabi view
Essays by user tnhoangthien :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16363636364 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58579861042 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1866858611 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391299191211 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170700370336 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115381664707 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265195469746 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947387013679 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.