The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.
The present diagrams illustrate the proportion of screened movies that produced in the UK, Australia, the USA, and other countries cinema which are shown in 2001 in the UK and Australia and also, the acceptance trend of cinema in the UK and Australia over a thirty-year period, from 1975 to 2005.
Looking at the first chart, it can be seen obviously that the most popular movies were American films in both counties, by 67 per cent and 75 percent in Australia and the UK, respectively.
On the other hand, the second popular movies in the UK were their cinema industry production by around 20 per cent while in Australia, other films got the second degree in popularity by approximately 20 per cent. In Australia, the lowest proportion of shown movies was related to the Australian films by about 5 per cent, however this category of films were shown in the UK about 11 per cent.
Turning to the second diagram, an overall view indicates that despite the several fluctuation, cinema admission experienced an upward trend in both countries, however the figures of the UK were higher that the Australian figures in all years.
In 1975, the amount of cinema admission in Australia was around 40 million while this figure was 100 for the UK. In 1985, both countries experienced a lowest point, while after that they showed an increased and reached a peak.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...n the UK, Australia, the USA, and other countries cinema which are shown in 2001 in the U...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 75, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fluctuation seems to be countable; consider using: 'several fluctuations'.
Suggestion: several fluctuations
...overall view indicates that despite the several fluctuation, cinema admission experienced an upward...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 150, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...UK. In 1985, both countries experienced a lowest point, while after that they sho...
^
Line 17, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...showed an increased and reached a peak.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90557939914 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64225752009 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497854077253 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5762344826 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.285714286 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2857142857 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319536581324 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14967049686 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979496885535 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182178019009 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906570759082 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.