The charts below ahow the energy consumption in UK and USA in 2000 and 2006

Essay topics:

The charts below ahow the energy consumption in UK and USA in 2000 and 2006

The two bargraphs demonstrate the consumption of energy sources namely oil, coal, gas, nuclear power, and other renewable sources in the usa and th uk between the years of 2000-2006.Units are estimated in percentages.

Overall, the oil and coal consumed were the upward trends in 2000, however there was a noticeable reduction in the usage of coal. But the amount of gas used experienced a significant climb. Whereas the least preferred energy kind in both countries were other renewable sources.

In 2000, the consumed oil accounted for just above 40% in the usa and nearly 26% in uk, while in 2006 the figures of usa rose rapidly to 40%, and the rates of uk saw a slight increase by 2%. The next large number was in coal almost 30% and 35% in uk and us repectively.

On the other hand, the minimal decrease was noticed in the usage of downward trend reaching almost 2% in usa, in uk it maintained the same level. Also, in 2006 gas consumption in the uk was just above the 35%. other changes in nuclear power were considerable.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-28 taoxanh99 80 view
2024-06-28 taoxanh99 view
2024-06-26 unstoppable 67 view
2024-06-24 trpg143 67 view
2024-06-24 trpg143 67 view
Essays by user Elizabeth :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
...nd th uk between the years of 2000-2006.Units are estimated in percentages. Overa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s used experienced a significant climb. Whereas the least preferred energy kind in both...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries were other renewable sources. In 2000, the consumed oil accounted for ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mal decrease was noticed in the usage of downward trend reaching almost 2% in usa...
^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...ption in the uk was just above the 35%. other changes in nuclear power were considera...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67213114754 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67927905149 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2546833493 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0652626526227 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0262446735396 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261317341682 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0444215073425 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200152410777 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.