The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984.
The charts compare populations’ age distribution by gender in 2 countries in 1984.
It is clear that, India had a younger population compared to which of France, with a noticeably larger proportion of people aged under 20. On the other hand, France had a significantly larger percentage of elderly inhabitants.
In India, almost 14% of population were aged from 0 to 5, and each five-year age bracket above this contained an increasingly smaller proportion of the population. By contrast, France’s population were more evenly distributed across the age ranges, with the percentages of each five-year cohorts of citizens under 40 fluctuate between 7% and 8 %. About 15% of French people were over 70 whereas this pattern of age in India was only 4%.
Looking further in gender aging structure, French women were more likely to had a longer life expectancy than men. For example, almost 3% women were 75 and older whereas the figure for men was just over 1%. India, on the other hand, was quite balance in their age structure when it was divided by gender.
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 61
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject.What are causes? And what will be effects on society? 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 78
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, whereas, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0393258427 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93238089503 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634831460674 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1599519656 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325641382084 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13661999618 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106808410752 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218389177151 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105561724657 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.