The provided pie charts illustrate the percentage of thrown-away waste in a particular nation in 1960 and 2011
Overall, as is apparent from the charts that almost types of waste disposed of witnessed a radical change. In addition, paper accounted for the majority in 1960 whereas food comprised the biggest proportion in 2011.
A quick glance at the first chart reveals that the rate of paper was one fourth, followed by 17% and 12% of the figure of textiles and food, respectively. Moreover, green waste, plastic and metal all made up approximately 8%, which was twice as much as wood and glass, about 4% and 5%. Additionally, there was 19% in the rate of other waste disposed of in 1960.
Turning to other set of data, the percentage of food and plastic had undergone a substantial upward trend at nearly 10% while that of paper was opposed and declined to 15%, this was no longer the priority. Furthermore, there was a constant trend in the the rate of green waste, metal and gloss yet wood consisted of 8%, twice as much as that of this figure in 1960. On the other hand, the year 2011 experienced a significant decrease in the proportion of the other waste and textiles at 4% and 11%, respectively.
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to be successful at school 92
- The picture below show the differences in the layout of conference centre between its present and its future plan Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some educationalists argue that non exam art based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance To what extent 89
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in a particular nation in 1960 and 2011 Overall, as is apparent from the charts ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...thermore, there was a constant trend in the the rate of green waste, metal and gloss ye...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...thermore, there was a constant trend in the the rate of green waste, metal and gloss ye...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69953051643 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69835859437 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6759163308 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207316258373 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949449997722 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084522109328 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149693382837 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624616726651 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.