The provided pie charts illustrate the percentage of thrown-away waste in a particular nation in 1960 and 2011
Overall, as is apparent from the charts that almost types of waste disposed of witnessed a radical change. In addition, paper accounted for the majority in 1960 whereas food comprised the biggest proportion in 2011.
A quick glance at the first chart reveals that the rate of paper was one fourth, followed by 17% and 12% of the figure of textiles and food, respectively. Moreover, green waste, plastic and metal all made up approximately 8%, which was twice as much as wood and glass, about 4% and 5%. Additionally, there was 19% in the rate of other waste disposed of in 1960.
Turning to other set of data, the percentage of food and plastic had undergone a substantial upward trend at nearly 10% while that of paper was opposed and declined to 15%, this was no longer the priority. Furthermore, there was a constant trend in the the rate of green waste, metal and gloss yet wood consisted of 8%, twice as much as that of this figure in 1960. On the other hand, the year 2011 experienced a significant decrease in the proportion of the other waste and textiles at 4% and 11%, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in a particular nation in 1960 and 2011 Overall, as is apparent from the charts ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...thermore, there was a constant trend in the the rate of green waste, metal and gloss ye...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...thermore, there was a constant trend in the the rate of green waste, metal and gloss ye...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69953051643 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69835859437 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6759163308 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207316258373 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949449997722 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084522109328 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149693382837 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624616726651 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.